The Social Security Administration (SSA) holds some of the most sensitive personal information of millions of Americans. It maintains records of Social Security numbers, earnings, and benefit distributions. However, recent developments have raised concerns over the security and privacy of this data. In early 2025, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), led by tech entrepreneur Elon Musk, sought access to SSA records to improve efficiency and reduce fraud. While this initiative may have good intentions, it has sparked widespread concerns about privacy risks and unauthorized access.
DOGE’s Mission and Its Controversial Actions
DOGE was established under President Donald Trump’s administration with the goal of eliminating inefficiencies in federal agencies. Under Elon Musk’s leadership, DOGE has been granted significant authority to review and streamline government operations. However, its aggressive approach, particularly regarding access to sensitive data, has led to controversy.
One of DOGE’s recent focuses has been investigating potential fraud within the Social Security system. Musk has publicly claimed that millions of deceased individuals are still receiving benefits, indicating large-scale fraudulent activities. While this claim has raised eyebrows, many experts and SSA officials remain skeptical about the validity of his assertions.
The Resignation of SSA Acting Commissioner Michelle King
The tension between DOGE and the SSA reached a peak when Michelle King, the Acting Commissioner of SSA, resigned after refusing to grant DOGE access to beneficiary data. King emphasized that protecting citizens’ private information was her top priority, and she feared that allowing DOGE access could compromise personal records.
Her resignation highlights the ongoing battle between government efficiency and privacy protection. Shortly after her departure, Leland Dudek was appointed as the new Acting Commissioner. Unlike King, Dudek has shown willingness to cooperate with DOGE. He assured the public that DOGE would only have read-only access to SSA records, meaning they would not be able to alter any data. However, privacy advocates remain skeptical about the implications of this access.
Major Concerns Regarding DOGE’s Access to SSA Records
The possibility of DOGE accessing Social Security records raises several serious concerns:
1. Privacy Risks
Social Security records contain highly sensitive information, including Social Security numbers, addresses, and financial details. If unauthorized access occurs, there is a high risk of identity theft, financial fraud, and misuse of personal data. Critics argue that DOGE’s involvement, particularly under Musk’s leadership, could lead to unintended data exposure.
2. Data Integrity and Misuse
Even if DOGE is granted read-only access, there are still risks involved. Misinterpretation or mishandling of data could lead to disruptions in benefit distributions. For example, if an error is flagged as fraud, innocent beneficiaries might face delays in receiving their payments.
3. Setting a Dangerous Precedent
If DOGE is given access to SSA records, it could open the door for other non-traditional government entities to demand similar access. This could create a situation where sensitive data is more freely shared, increasing the risk of leaks and misuse. Privacy advocates warn that this decision could set a dangerous precedent for the future.
Analyzing Musk’s Claims of Social Security Fraud
Elon Musk has repeatedly claimed that millions of deceased individuals are still receiving Social Security benefits. While fraud within the SSA system does exist, it is not as widespread as Musk suggests.
Understanding Data Anomalies
One of the reasons for apparent fraud is outdated SSA systems. The agency still relies on the COBOL programming language, which can produce anomalies in records. For example, missing birthdates may default to placeholder values, making it seem like individuals over 150 years old are receiving benefits. These technical issues are often mistaken for fraudulent activity.
Reality of Overpayments
While there have been instances of Social Security overpayments, they are not as significant as Musk claims. Audits reveal that only about 0.84% of SSA payments are improper. Most of these errors occur due to delayed reporting of deaths or administrative mistakes, rather than intentional fraud. The SSA actively works to recover these funds and prevent further occurrences.
Public Reaction and Political Responses
The news of DOGE’s involvement with the SSA has triggered strong reactions from various groups. Privacy advocates, lawmakers, and cybersecurity experts have expressed concerns over potential data breaches and misuse of information. Some members of Congress have called for stricter oversight on how DOGE interacts with federal agencies, emphasizing the need to protect citizen data.
On the other hand, supporters of Musk’s initiative believe that streamlining the SSA could help reduce fraud and make benefit distribution more efficient. They argue that if DOGE can identify inefficiencies, it could save taxpayers billions of dollars in the long run.
How Beneficiaries Can Protect Their Social Security Information
Given the heightened concerns about data security, Social Security beneficiaries should take proactive steps to protect their personal information:
1. Regularly Monitor Your Social Security Statements
Review your statements for any unusual activity or discrepancies. You can check your records online through the official SSA website to ensure there are no unauthorized changes.
2. Stay Informed About Data Security Measures
Keep up with announcements from the SSA regarding any potential security risks or breaches. Awareness is key to preventing identity theft and fraud.
3. Use Strong Security Measures
Make sure to use strong passwords for your SSA online account. Enable two-factor authentication if available, and be cautious of phishing scams that attempt to steal personal information.
The Road Ahead: What Comes Next?
As DOGE continues its mission to reform government operations, the fate of Social Security records remains uncertain. With Leland Dudek at the helm of the SSA, there is likely to be more collaboration between the agency and DOGE. However, the level of access DOGE will ultimately receive remains a subject of debate.
It is crucial for lawmakers and the public to remain vigilant in ensuring that efficiency improvements do not come at the cost of privacy. While eliminating fraud and optimizing processes are necessary, they should never compromise the fundamental right to data security.